Adam represented one of the prevailing respondents. The Court of Appeal was called upon to interpret and apply language in a trust instrument which directed the trustee to distribute certain real property to a beneficiary’s subtrust. That directive was merely a mechanism for funding that beneficiary’s residual gift, assuming the trustor still owned the property as of the trustor’s death. The reference to a specific source of funding—that certain property—did not make it a specific gift.
This website is for general information purposes only, and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Connection to this website, and communication to this law firm via E-mail, do not constitute an attorney-client relationship unless a separate agreement is reached between this law firm and prospective client as to the nature of any relationship and the amount to be charged for the intended legal services